Balanced rocks survive great flood?
Throughout the world there are many formations a large stone body is balanced precariously. We can tell then some of these formations were not caused by rocks tumbling off a mountain but instead were large rock hills many million years ago and have been eroded away by wind and water such as the one at the right. Because wind erosion is generally not incredibly powerful this means that the formations would have been much the same 4,500 years ago. The time creationist claim was the date of the global flood.
There is a reason that we do not see such balanced rocks in aquatic landscapes. Water is a very powerfully force and when moving would exert hundreds or even thousands of pounds of pressure upon such objects. Had there been a genesis flood these formations would have been knocked over plain and simple.
I am the destroyer of atheism. There was a giant water table under the earth and over a thousand water giessers shoot water into the earth’s atmosphere 120,000 feet high. Plus, the contients were one super contienent back then. That explains the different animals making it to the ark. Look in Genesis chapter 8 verse 2 about the FOUNTAINS OF THE DEEP.
How do you get all that out of the phrase ‘foundations of the deep’?
The super continent divided into 7 continents and they are still drifting apart, in continental drift, today. Also, there is more water vapor in the atmospere to see rainbows, after millions apon millions of gallons was released, from the giant water table, that was under the earth, to cause that world wide flood. Please, ask me even more, so called tough questions about God. Remember, that other Christians are innocient compared to me.
You haven’t actually answered my question. Where does the Bible say anything like what you said?
where is the evidence for these “thousand giessers[sic]“? the only thing you are a destroyer of is creationist credibility.
It helps to use correct grammar when trying to create a valid arguement. Zeal does not make lies truth. It only makes one look desperate.
im confuse?
i mean i don’t understand can anyone at all help me?
If you look at the bottom of the oceans you will notice that they have fault lines, of which, are split in the upward direction. And about the balanced rock… were you there? What part of your conclusion is science? Were you there to test, study, observe how these rocks got there? no. The past cannot be studied by science, because it is no longer the past… it is now the present. One cannot say difinitavely. One can draw conclusions the same way forensic scientist do, BUT if they do not have all the evidence then they can easily come up with the wrong conclusion. So you must then take in eye witness accounts. Are these accounts creditble of the global flood? They have stood the test of time.